There's a brand new peer-reviewed study from an economist and expert on guns, John Lott, Jr. that will have lots of people discussing the 2020 presidential election.
Lott discovered that there were at least 255,000 additional votes, possibly as much as 368,000, for Biden in crucial battleground states.
From the Washington Examiner:
“In a summary of his study on statistical data he presented in the publication RealClearPolitics, he stated that ‘Biden did not win the states of Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin by the sum of 313,253 votes. With the exception of Michigan the gap was just 159,065.”’
Therefore, the difference could be significant and important; however Lott states that his goal isn't contesting the election but to highlight the issues that could arise in future elections.
In his research, Lott reviewed voter registration lists, actual in-person voting counts, absentee votes, and provisional ballots for counties where fraud was alleged or suspected. He compared the results to nearby counties, and argued that the proportions of votes should be the same.
The findings he uncovered showed major variations, which raised questions about fraud.There were no explanations for the voting patterns, massive disparities in absentee votes, and other issues such as the bloated voter lists, or felons voting illegally.
“In Fulton County, Georgia, 2,423 voters were not listed on the state's records as registered, and 2,560 felons voted even though they had not completed their sentences,” Lott declared in his report.
He concluded that “The voter turnout rate data provide stronger evidence of significant excess Biden votes in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. The estimates imply that the counties wherein vote fraud was alleged returned between 142,000 and 368,000 excess Biden votes. While the findings reported here are dramatic, they may be underestimates because the voter turnout estimates do not account for ballots cast for the opposing candidate that are lost, destroyed, or replaced with ballots filled out for the other candidate. While it would involve a lot more work, it would be possible to apply the precinct level tests to compare turnout rates in adjacent precincts across all the counties where fraud was alleged.”
It's going to cause a lot of people to talk about the origins of the extra votes. It is normal to have votes taken from things like ballots for provisional elections and other variants; however, what's intriguing about Lott’s claims is that the number of votes were different in crucial regions. This is a question that must be clarified.